The Opposite(Antonym) of “anecdotical”
The antonyms of anecdotical are scientific, objective, and rigorous. The antonyms scientific, objective, and rigorous convey a factual and unbiased approach to information. It implies that the information is based on evidence, research, and logical reasoning.
Explore all Antonyms of “anecdotical”
Definitions and Examples of scientific, objective, rigorous
Learn when and how to use these words with these examples!
Relating to or based on science, characterized by empirical methods and systematic observation.
Example
The study was conducted using scientific methods and peer-reviewed by experts in the field.
Not influenced by personal feelings or opinions; unbiased and impartial.
Example
The journalist tried to present the news in an objective manner, without any bias or prejudice.
Thorough, exhaustive, and precise; adhering strictly to a set of standards or rules.
Example
The research was conducted with rigorous attention to detail, ensuring that all variables were accounted for.
Key Differences: scientific vs objective vs rigorous
- 1Scientific refers to a method of inquiry that relies on empirical evidence and systematic observation.
- 2Objective refers to a perspective that is free from personal feelings or opinions.
- 3Rigorous refers to a process that is thorough, exhaustive, and precise.
Effective Usage of scientific, objective, rigorous
- 1Academic Writing: Use scientific, objective, and rigorous to convey a factual and unbiased approach to research.
- 2Critical Thinking: Incorporate antonyms in discussions to evaluate the credibility of sources and arguments.
- 3Professional Communication: Utilize these antonyms in workplace communication to ensure clarity and accuracy of information.
Remember this!
The antonyms have distinct nuances: Scientific conveys reliance on empirical evidence and systematic observation, objective denotes freedom from personal feelings or opinions, and rigorous refers to a process that is thorough, exhaustive, and precise. Use these words to convey a factual and unbiased approach to research, evaluate the credibility of sources and arguments, and ensure clarity and accuracy of information in professional communication.
