Definitions
- Describing something related to or pertaining to arbitration. - Referring to the process or procedure of arbitration. - Talking about the decisions or awards made by an arbitrator.
- Referring to the formal process of resolving disputes outside of court. - Describing a method of alternative dispute resolution. - Talking about the involvement of a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, to make a binding decision.
List of Similarities
- 1Both involve the resolution of disputes.
- 2Both are alternatives to going to court.
- 3Both require the involvement of a neutral third party.
- 4Both aim to reach a binding decision.
- 5Both can be used to settle legal or contractual disputes.
What is the difference?
- 1Usage: Arbitral is an adjective used to describe things related to arbitration, while arbitration is a noun referring to the process itself.
- 2Formality: Arbitral is less commonly used and more formal, while arbitration is more commonly used and can be used in both formal and informal contexts.
- 3Focus: Arbitral emphasizes the decisions or awards made by an arbitrator, while arbitration focuses on the overall process of resolving disputes.
- 4Scope: Arbitral is narrower in scope and specifically relates to arbitration, while arbitration is a broader term that encompasses the entire process of resolving disputes outside of court.
- 5Function: Arbitral is used to describe or modify other words, while arbitration is used as a standalone noun.
Remember this!
Arbitral and arbitration are related terms that involve the resolution of disputes through a neutral third party. However, the difference between them lies in their usage, formality, focus, scope, and function. Arbitral is an adjective used to describe things related to arbitration, such as decisions or awards made by an arbitrator. On the other hand, arbitration is a noun that refers to the overall process of resolving disputes outside of court, involving the involvement of a neutral third party to make a binding decision.
