Definitions
- Referring to the state of being whole or entire, with nothing missing or lacking. - Talking about the quality of being comprehensive or including all necessary elements or parts. - Describing the condition of being finished or fully done, with no further additions or modifications needed.
- Referring to the state of being complete or undivided, with all parts or aspects working together in harmony. - Talking about the quality of being integrated or unified, with no conflicting or contradictory elements. - Describing the condition of being sound or healthy, with no physical or emotional injuries or damages.
List of Similarities
- 1Both words refer to a state of completeness or entirety.
- 2Both words emphasize the absence of missing or lacking elements.
- 3Both words can be used to describe a finished or final state.
- 4Both words can be used in a figurative or abstract sense.
What is the difference?
- 1Scope: Completeness emphasizes the inclusion of all necessary elements, while wholeness emphasizes the integration or unity of those elements.
- 2Context: Completeness is often used in technical or formal contexts, while wholeness is more commonly used in personal or spiritual contexts.
- 3Connotation: Completeness can have a neutral or positive connotation, while wholeness often has a positive or aspirational connotation.
- 4Usage: Completeness is often used to describe tangible or measurable things, while wholeness is often used to describe intangible or subjective things.
Remember this!
Completeness and wholeness both refer to a state of entirety or completeness, but they differ in their emphasis and usage. Completeness emphasizes the inclusion of all necessary elements, often in technical or formal contexts, while wholeness emphasizes the integration or unity of those elements, often in personal or spiritual contexts.
