Definitions
- Referring to the process of resolving a dispute or conflict through negotiation and compromise. - Describing the act of bringing two opposing parties together to find a mutually agreeable solution. - Talking about the attempt to restore harmony and goodwill between two parties who have had a disagreement.
- Referring to the process of resolving a dispute or conflict through the assistance of a neutral third party. - Describing the act of facilitating communication and negotiation between two parties to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. - Talking about the attempt to find a resolution to a conflict by bringing in a mediator to help the parties communicate and negotiate.
List of Similarities
- 1Both involve the resolution of a dispute or conflict.
- 2Both require the involvement of a neutral third party.
- 3Both aim to find a mutually acceptable solution.
- 4Both involve negotiation and compromise.
- 5Both can be used in legal or non-legal contexts.
What is the difference?
- 1Role of the third party: In conciliation, the third party acts as a facilitator and helps the parties reach a compromise. In mediation, the third party takes a more active role in the process and may suggest solutions or make recommendations.
- 2Timing: Conciliation usually takes place before any legal action is taken, while mediation can take place at any stage of a dispute, including during a trial.
- 3Legal status: Conciliation is not legally binding, while mediation can result in a legally binding agreement.
- 4Scope: Conciliation is often used for disputes involving personal relationships or workplace conflicts, while mediation is commonly used in legal disputes or international conflicts.
- 5Outcome: Conciliation aims to restore goodwill and improve relationships between the parties, while mediation focuses on finding a practical solution to the dispute.
Remember this!
Conciliation and mediation are both methods of resolving disputes or conflicts through negotiation and compromise with the help of a neutral third party. However, the main difference between them lies in the role of the third party, timing, legal status, scope, and outcome.