Definitions
- Describing the act of coming between two parties in a conflict or dispute. - Referring to taking action to prevent or stop something from happening. - Talking about getting involved in a situation to provide assistance or support.
- Describing the act of helping two parties in a conflict or dispute reach a resolution. - Referring to facilitating communication and negotiation between two parties. - Talking about acting as an intermediary to resolve a disagreement or dispute.
List of Similarities
- 1Both involve resolving conflicts or disputes.
- 2Both require a third party to be involved.
- 3Both aim to find a solution that satisfies both parties.
- 4Both require good communication skills.
- 5Both can be used in legal or personal contexts.
What is the difference?
- 1Role: Intervening involves taking action to stop or prevent something from happening, while mediating involves facilitating communication and negotiation between two parties.
- 2Approach: Intervening can be forceful and direct, while mediating is more collaborative and neutral.
- 3Goal: Intervening aims to stop or prevent a negative outcome, while mediating aims to find a mutually acceptable solution.
- 4Timing: Intervening can happen before or during a conflict, while mediating usually happens after a conflict has arisen.
- 5Outcome: Intervening may not necessarily lead to a resolution, while mediating aims to find a resolution that satisfies both parties.
Remember this!
Intervene and mediate are both words that describe the act of resolving conflicts or disputes. However, the difference between the two is their approach and goal. Intervening involves taking action to stop or prevent something from happening, while mediating involves facilitating communication and negotiation between two parties to find a mutually acceptable solution.
