Definitions
- Describing a person who is cunning, manipulative, and willing to do whatever it takes to achieve their goals. - Referring to someone who is strategic and calculating in their actions, often at the expense of others. - Talking about a person who is willing to use deceit and manipulation to gain power or control over others.
- Referring to someone who influences or controls others through deceptive or unfair means. - Describing a person who uses emotional or psychological tactics to get what they want from others. - Talking about someone who is skilled at manipulating situations or people to their advantage.
List of Similarities
- 1Both words describe people who use deceptive or unfair means to achieve their goals.
- 2Both words imply a certain level of cunning and strategic thinking.
- 3Both words can be used to describe negative behavior or traits in a person.
What is the difference?
- 1Connotation: Machiavellist has a more negative connotation than manipulator, implying a willingness to do whatever it takes to achieve one's goals, even if it means harming others. Manipulator can have a more neutral connotation, depending on the context.
- 2Scope: Machiavellist is often used in the context of politics or power struggles, while manipulator can be used in a wider range of contexts.
- 3Intensity: Machiavellist implies a higher level of manipulation and deceit than manipulator, which can refer to more subtle forms of manipulation.
- 4Formality: Machiavellist is a less common and more formal word than manipulator, which is more commonly used in everyday language.
Remember this!
Machiavellist and manipulator are both words that describe people who use deceitful or unfair means to achieve their goals. However, machiavellist has a more negative connotation and is often used in the context of politics or power struggles, while manipulator can be used in a wider range of contexts and has a more neutral connotation.
