Definitions
- Referring to the role of a neutral third party in helping two or more parties resolve a dispute or conflict. - Talking about the process of mediation, which involves the mediator facilitating communication and negotiation between the parties. - Describing the skills and techniques used by a mediator to help the parties reach a mutually beneficial agreement.
- Referring to the process of discussing and reaching an agreement between two or more parties with conflicting interests. - Talking about the skills and techniques used to persuade and influence others to reach a favorable outcome. - Describing a formal or informal discussion aimed at resolving differences and reaching a compromise.
List of Similarities
- 1Both involve resolving conflicts or differences between two or more parties.
- 2Both require communication and active listening skills.
- 3Both aim to reach a mutually beneficial agreement.
- 4Both can be formal or informal processes.
- 5Both require a neutral or impartial third party to facilitate the process.
What is the difference?
- 1Role: Mediatorship involves a neutral third party facilitating communication and negotiation, while negotiation may or may not involve a third party.
- 2Approach: Mediatorship focuses on finding common ground and understanding between the parties, while negotiation may involve more persuasion and bargaining.
- 3Scope: Mediatorship can cover a wide range of issues and disputes, while negotiation is often focused on specific topics or interests.
- 4Power: Mediatorship does not have the power to impose a decision on the parties, while negotiation may involve one party having more power or leverage than the other.
- 5Timing: Mediatorship is often used when the parties are at an impasse or deadlock, while negotiation can take place at any stage of a conflict or disagreement.
Remember this!
Mediatorship and negotiation are both processes used to resolve conflicts or differences between two or more parties. However, the difference between mediatorship and negotiation lies in their approach, scope, and timing. Mediatorship involves a neutral third party facilitating communication and negotiation to find common ground and understanding between the parties, while negotiation may involve more persuasion and bargaining and can focus on specific topics or interests. Additionally, mediatorship is often used when the parties are at an impasse or deadlock, while negotiation can take place at any stage of a conflict or disagreement.
