Definitions
- Describing a situation where a person is not biased towards any particular side or party. - Referring to the quality of being fair and impartial in decision-making. - Talking about the act of treating all parties equally without favoritism.
- Referring to the quality of being unbiased and impartial in decision-making. - Describing a situation where a person is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions. - Talking about the act of presenting information or facts without personal bias or prejudice.
List of Similarities
- 1Both words describe the quality of being unbiased and impartial.
- 2Both words emphasize the importance of treating all parties equally.
- 3Both words are used to describe decision-making processes that are free from personal bias or prejudice.
What is the difference?
- 1Usage: Nonpartiality is less commonly used than objectivity.
- 2Focus: Nonpartiality emphasizes the act of treating all parties equally, while objectivity focuses on presenting information without personal bias.
- 3Application: Nonpartiality is often used in legal or judicial contexts, while objectivity can be applied to various fields such as science, journalism, and research.
- 4Connotation: Nonpartiality has a more formal and legal connotation, while objectivity can be used in both formal and informal contexts.
Remember this!
Nonpartiality and objectivity are synonyms that describe the quality of being unbiased and impartial. While both words share similarities, they differ in their usage, focus, application, connotation, and etymology. Nonpartiality is less commonly used and has a more formal and legal connotation, emphasizing the act of treating all parties equally. On the other hand, objectivity is more versatile and can be applied to various fields, focusing on presenting information without personal bias.
