Definitions
- Describing a person who is lazy and lacks ambition. - Referring to someone who is careless and neglectful in their duties or responsibilities. - Talking about someone who is disorganized and lacks direction in life.
- Describing someone who fails to fulfill their obligations or duties. - Referring to a person who behaves recklessly or without regard for consequences. - Talking about someone who is unreliable and cannot be trusted to follow through on commitments.
List of Similarities
- 1Both words describe negative qualities in a person's character.
- 2Both words suggest a lack of accountability or reliability.
- 3Both words imply a disregard for consequences or outcomes.
- 4Both words can be used to describe someone who is not trustworthy.
What is the difference?
- 1Connotation: Shriftless has a more negative connotation than irresponsible, suggesting a lack of ambition and direction in life.
- 2Scope: Irresponsible is a broader term that can encompass a wider range of behaviors, while shriftless is more specific to laziness and neglectfulness.
- 3Usage: Shriftless is more commonly used in literature or historical contexts, while irresponsible is used in everyday language.
- 4Formality: Irresponsible is a more formal word than shriftless, which is considered old-fashioned and informal.
Remember this!
Shriftless and irresponsible are both negative words used to describe someone who lacks accountability and reliability. However, shriftless suggests a lack of ambition and direction in life, while irresponsible is a broader term that can encompass a wider range of behaviors. Additionally, shriftless is an archaic term that is rarely used in modern English, while irresponsible is a more common and versatile word.