What is the opposite of “inattackable”?

What is the antonym of “inattackable”?

The antonym of inattackable is vulnerable, weak, and defeatable. These antonyms describe a state of being susceptible to harm, damage, or defeat.

Brief Definitions of the Antonym(s)

Learn when and how to use these words with these examples!

vulnerable

Open to physical or emotional harm, damage, or attack.

Example

The company's security system was vulnerable to hacking, which led to a data breach.

weak

Lacking strength, power, or resilience; easily broken or defeated.

Example

The boxer was weak and couldn't withstand his opponent's punches.

defeatable

Capable of being defeated or overcome.

Example

The enemy's army was defeatable with the right strategy and resources.

How are these antonyms different from each other?

• 1. Vulnerable implies a state of being open to harm or attack, while inattackable means impervious to attack.
• 2. Weak suggests a lack of strength or resilience, while inattackable implies an invincible or unassailable state.
• 3. Defeatable describes something that can be overcome or defeated, while inattackable suggests something that cannot be attacked or penetrated.

Good things to know

• 1. Security: Use inattackable to describe a system or structure that is impervious to attack.
• 2. Physical Strength: Use weak to describe a person or object that lacks physical strength or resilience.
• 3. Strategy: Use defeatable to describe an opponent or obstacle that can be overcome with the right strategy and resources.

📌

Remember this!

The antonyms have distinct nuances: Vulnerable implies openness to harm, weak denotes a lack of strength, and defeatable suggests something that can be overcome. Use these words in different contexts to describe a system or structure that is impervious to attack, a person or object that lacks physical strength or resilience, or an opponent or obstacle that can be overcome with the right strategy and resources.