Definitions
- Describing a word or phrase that is used to represent something else that it is closely associated with. - Referring to a figure of speech that replaces the name of a thing with the name of something else that is closely related. - Talking about a type of metaphor that uses a related term to stand in for the actual object or idea.
- Describing language that uses figures of speech to create meaning beyond the literal interpretation. - Referring to a type of language that employs metaphors, similes, and other figures of speech to convey a deeper meaning. - Talking about a way of speaking or writing that goes beyond the literal meaning of words to create a more imaginative or expressive effect.
List of Similarities
- 1Both are types of language that go beyond literal meaning.
- 2Both use figures of speech to create meaning.
- 3Both can be used to add depth and nuance to language.
- 4Both require an understanding of context to interpret correctly.
- 5Both can be used to make language more engaging and expressive.
What is the difference?
- 1Scope: Metonymical language is more limited in scope, using a closely related term to represent a specific object or idea. Figurative language can encompass a wider range of figures of speech and can be used to create more complex meanings.
- 2Purpose: Metonymical language is often used for clarity or brevity, while figurative language is used to add depth and nuance to language.
- 3Association: Metonymical language relies on a close association between the term used and the object or idea it represents. Figurative language can use a wider range of associations and comparisons to create meaning.
- 4Connotation: Metonymical language is often neutral or factual in tone, while figurative language can be more emotional or expressive.
- 5Usage: Metonymical language is more commonly used in technical or specialized contexts, while figurative language is more common in everyday language and literature.
Remember this!
Metonymical and figurative are both types of language that go beyond literal meaning and use figures of speech to create meaning. However, metonymical language is more limited in scope and often used for clarity or brevity, while figurative language is used to add depth and nuance to language and can encompass a wider range of figures of speech.