Definitions
- Referring to a wrestling match where one wrestler pins their opponent's shoulders to the mat for a count of three. - Talking about a victory in wrestling achieved by pinning the opponent. - Describing a wrestling move where a wrestler holds their opponent's shoulders to the mat for a count of three.
- Referring to a wrestling match where one wrestler forces their opponent to submit by tapping out or verbally conceding. - Talking about a victory in wrestling achieved by forcing the opponent to submit. - Describing a wrestling move where a wrestler applies a hold or lock to force their opponent to submit.
List of Similarities
- 1Both are terms used in wrestling matches.
- 2Both refer to a victory achieved over an opponent.
- 3Both involve a wrestler gaining control over their opponent.
- 4Both require the opponent to be immobilized or incapacitated.
- 5Both can end a wrestling match.
What is the difference?
- 1Method: Pinfall involves holding the opponent's shoulders to the mat for a count of three, while submission involves applying a hold or lock to force the opponent to concede.
- 2Outcome: Pinfall results in a win by pinning the opponent, while submission results in a win by forcing the opponent to submit.
- 3Difficulty: Submission is often considered a more difficult victory to achieve than pinfall as it requires a higher level of skill and technique.
- 4Risk: Submission carries a higher risk of injury to the opponent than pinfall as it involves applying pressure to joints and limbs.
- 5Strategy: Pinfall is often used as a quick and decisive way to end a match, while submission may be used as a strategic way to wear down an opponent over time.
Remember this!
Pinfall and submission are both terms used in wrestling to describe a victory over an opponent. However, the difference between them lies in the method of achieving the victory. Pinfall involves holding the opponent's shoulders to the mat for a count of three, while submission involves applying a hold or lock to force the opponent to concede. While both methods have similarities, they also have differences in outcome, difficulty, risk, and strategy.
