The Opposite(Antonym) of “encyclopedic”
The antonyms of encyclopedic are superficial, incomplete, and limited. These antonyms describe a lack of depth, breadth, or comprehensiveness in knowledge or understanding.
Explore all Antonyms of “encyclopedic”
Definitions and Examples of superficial, incomplete, limited
Learn when and how to use these words with these examples!
Lacking depth, detail, or thoroughness; shallow.
Example
The article provided only a superficial analysis of the issue, without delving into its complexities.
Not finished or lacking some essential parts; partial.
Example
The report was deemed incomplete because it didn't include the latest data on the subject.
Restricted in scope, extent, or range; narrow.
Example
Her knowledge of the subject was limited to what she had learned in high school.
Key Differences: superficial vs incomplete vs limited
- 1Superficial implies a lack of depth or detail, while encyclopedic suggests comprehensive and thorough knowledge.
- 2Incomplete refers to something that is not finished or lacks essential parts, while encyclopedic implies a complete and comprehensive understanding.
- 3Limited suggests a narrow or restricted scope, while encyclopedic implies a broad and extensive knowledge.
Effective Usage of superficial, incomplete, limited
- 1Academic Writing: Use encyclopedic to describe a comprehensive understanding of a subject.
- 2Casual Conversation: Use superficial to describe a lack of depth or detail in a topic.
- 3Research: Use limited to describe a narrow scope of research or knowledge.
Remember this!
The antonyms of encyclopedic are superficial, incomplete, and limited. Use superficial to describe a lack of depth or detail, incomplete to describe something that is not finished or lacks essential parts, and limited to describe a narrow scope of research or knowledge. Use encyclopedic to describe a comprehensive understanding of a subject in academic writing.
