Definitions and Examples of neutral, impartial, unbiased
Learn when and how to use these words with these examples!
Not supporting or favoring either side in a conflict, dispute, or debate.
Example
The mediator remained neutral throughout the negotiations and did not take sides.
Treating all parties or people equally and without bias; fair and just.
Example
The judge was known for being impartial and making decisions based solely on the evidence presented.
Not showing favoritism or prejudice towards any particular side or party.
Example
The journalist strived to be unbiased in her reporting and present both sides of the story.
Key Differences: neutral vs impartial vs unbiased
- 1Neutral implies a complete lack of support or favoritism towards any side or party.
- 2Impartial suggests treating all parties equally and without bias, often in the context of decision-making.
- 3Unbiased conveys a lack of favoritism or prejudice towards any particular side or party, often in the context of reporting or analysis.
Effective Usage of neutral, impartial, unbiased
- 1Debate and Discussion: Use these antonyms to describe a lack of bias or favoritism in arguments and discussions.
- 2News and Media: Incorporate these antonyms in news reporting and analysis to demonstrate impartiality and objectivity.
- 3Academic Writing: Utilize these antonyms in academic writing to describe a neutral or unbiased perspective.
Remember this!
The antonyms of semineutral convey a lack of bias or favoritism towards any particular side or party. Neutral implies a complete lack of support, impartial suggests treating all parties equally, and unbiased conveys a lack of prejudice. Use these words in debates, news reporting, and academic writing to describe a neutral or unbiased perspective.